Migrate every Make scenario to n8n self-hosted — full parity, zero downtime, 80–95% cheaper
Make is great until the operation count makes it expensive. n8n self-hosted runs the same workflows for 80–95% less monthly cost — plus custom code, native AI agent nodes, branch-and-merge that Make filter expressions cannot match. We migrate every scenario with full parity, parallel-run for safety, then cut over with zero downtime. Hosting + monitoring run by us under retainer.
What our Make → n8n Migration engagements cover
Standard scope. Custom scope available on the audit.
Scenario-by-scenario migration
Every Make scenario rebuilt in n8n with full parity. Iterators, routers, error handlers all preserved. We do not skip the boring scenarios.
Parallel run + validation
2-week parallel run on production traffic. Output diffed between Make and n8n. Cutover only after validation passes.
Self-hosted infrastructure
Deployed on Hetzner or DigitalOcean with HTTPS, env management, automated backups, version pinning. Or n8n Cloud if you prefer.
Monitoring + retainer
Uptime monitoring, error alerting, weekly tuning, version upgrades. We run hosting; you own the workflows.
From audit to live Make → n8n migration build in 4 steps
Same engagement shape as every digicore101 build. Predictable timeline, predictable cost, no scope creep.
AI Audit
60-min strategy session, stack map, leak analysis, costed roadmap. Vendor-neutral — yours to keep.
- ·Architecture diagram
- ·Build sequence
- ·Cost + timeline lock
Architecture
Make → n8n migration schema, automations on paper, integration map, AI agent personas.
- ·Approved schema
- ·Sign-off on flows
- ·Migration plan if applicable
Build & Deploy
Weekly demos, staged rollout, full handoff documentation. You own everything.
- ·Live system
- ·Loom walkthroughs
- ·Team training session
Train & Support
Retainer keeps the Make → n8n migration stack tuned, monitored, and improving — not just running.
- ·Slack channel
- ·Weekly tune cycle
- ·Monthly reporting
Make Pro vs n8n self-hosted at 20k operations/month
Make Pro is fine until volume catches up. n8n self-hosted runs the same workflows for 80–95% less, plus capabilities Make filter expressions cannot match.
How Make.com compares to n8n
Migrate when the per-task math has flipped — not before.
How real teams migrated
Names anonymized where requested.
Agency · 28 scenarios → 14 n8n flows
40% fewer ops via consolidation. Net spend $279/mo → $35/mo. Custom code unlocked.
B2B SaaS · added LangChain agents during migration
Migration from Make to n8n with LangChain agent layer added in same engagement. RAG over 12k internal docs.
Service biz · self-hosted on Hetzner CX11
$5/mo Hetzner. We run hosting + monitoring + version pinning under retainer.
Coach · kept Make for simple flows
Migrated only high-volume scenarios. Kept simple Make scenarios. Best of both.
Honest scope — and who shouldn't engage
Migrate when the per-op math has flipped. Stay on Make if zero ops surface matters more.
- You spend $200+/mo on Make opsMigration pays back in 2–4 months at this spend.
- You need custom code or AI agentsCapabilities Make filter expressions cannot match.
- You are above 5,000 ops/mon8n economics dominate at this volume.
- Under 1,000 ops/moStay on Make. Migration cost will not pay back.
- Zero-ops teamEven managed n8n requires more attention than Make.
- You need 8000+ native connectorsn8n has fewer pre-built connectors. Most apps work via HTTP but adds setup time.
Every Make → n8n Migration build is a different shape.
We don't quote off a feature checklist — we quote off your stack, your bottleneck, and the build phases that actually move revenue. The audit is the front door: free, 7-day costed roadmap, vendor-neutral.
Questions before we start
Where Make → n8n Migration fits in the bigger picture
Most engagements layer 2–3 platforms with a service shape. These pages map the surrounding territory.
Ready to scope your Make → n8n Migration build?
Book the free AI System Audit. We map your stack, find the leaks, and deliver a build roadmap in 7 days. Vendor-neutral.